The 2007 Subaru Outback maintained its status as a versatile and capable crossover wagon, combining Subaru’s hallmark Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive with advanced safety features and refined interior comforts. With several trims and powertrains available, the 2007 Outback catered to a diverse range of drivers, from daily commuters to outdoor adventurers. Minor updates enhanced the model’s practicality and appeal in the midsize crossover segment.
Engine Specs and Performance
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Engine Options | 2.5L 4-cylinder (SOHC EJ253) / Turbocharged 2.5L (DOHC EJ255) / 3.0L 6-cylinder (EZ30) |
| Horsepower | 175 hp (2.5L) / 243 hp (Turbo 2.5L) / 245 hp (3.0L) |
| Torque | 169 lb-ft (2.5L) / 241 lb-ft (Turbo 2.5L) / 219 lb-ft (3.0L) |
| Transmission Options | 5-speed manual, 4-speed automatic, or 5-speed automatic (H6 models) |
| Drive Type | Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive (AWD) |
| 0-60 mph | ~8.7 seconds (2.5L) / ~6.2 seconds (Turbo) |
Dimensions
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Length | 189.0 inches |
| Width | 69.7 inches |
| Height | 61.0 inches |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 inches |
| Ground Clearance | 8.4–8.7 inches (varies by trim) |
| Curb Weight | ~3,300–3,800 pounds |
Fuel and MPG
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Fuel Type | Gasoline |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gallons |
| City MPG | 22 mpg (2.5L) / 18 mpg (Turbo) / 19 mpg (3.0L) |
| Highway MPG | 28 mpg (2.5L) / 24 mpg (Turbo) / 26 mpg (3.0L) |
Safety Features
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Brakes | 4-wheel disc brakes with ABS |
| Airbags | Dual front airbags, front-seat side airbags |
| Traction Control | Available on higher trims |
| Stability Control | Available on 3.0R trims |
| Lighting | Halogen headlights; optional HID headlights |
| Additional Features | Reinforced body structure, child seat anchors |
2007 Subaru Outback Interior Features
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Seating Capacity | 5 passengers |
| Upholstery | Cloth (base) or optional leather |
| Dashboard | Refined with woodgrain or metallic accents |
| Infotainment | AM/FM stereo, 6-CD changer, optional navigation |
| Climate Control | Manual or dual-zone automatic available |
| Additional Features | Heated front seats, power-adjustable driver’s seat, split-folding rear seats |
2007 Subaru Outback Exterior Features
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Body Style | Wagon |
| Headlights | Halogen (standard), HID (optional) |
| Wheels | 16-inch steel or 17-inch alloy wheels |
| Roof Rails | Standard |
| Paint Options | Wide variety, including two-tone schemes |
| Additional Features | Integrated fog lights, rugged lower body cladding |
Current Price in U.S.
| Condition | Price Range |
|---|---|
| Excellent (Restored) | $8,000–$12,000 |
| Good (Well-maintained) | $5,500–$8,000 |
| Fair (Functional but Worn) | $3,500–$5,500 |
| Poor (Needs Repairs) | $2,000–$3,500 |
Other Features
- Symmetrical AWD: Reliable traction for all road and weather conditions.
- Turbocharged Engine Option: Delivers sporty performance and brisk acceleration.
- Premium Trim Options: Available with luxury features like leather seating and dual-zone climate control.
- Safety-Oriented Design: Reinforced structure and a suite of airbags provide peace of mind.
The 2007 Subaru Outback remained a strong contender in the crossover market, combining utility and comfort with a reputation for reliability. Its balance of rugged capability and refined design makes it a standout choice for families and adventurers alike.
2007 Subaru Outback vs. 2007 Forester: Which Aged Better?
In 2007, Subaru offered two rugged, all-wheel-drive wagons that appealed to practical drivers and outdoor enthusiasts alike: the Outback and the Forester. Nearly two decades later, both vehicles have built loyal followings—but which one has truly stood the test of time? Here’s how the 2007 Outback and Forester compare in 2025.
Design & Practicality
Outback
- Essentially a lifted Legacy wagon with rugged cladding.
- Larger overall size means more cargo space and rear legroom.
- Wagon design gives it a more car-like ride and appearance.
- Ideal for long road trips, families, or those who need more room.
Forester
- More compact, upright SUV styling.
- Easier to maneuver and park in urban environments.
- Still roomy enough for a small family or adventure gear.
- Better visibility thanks to its tall greenhouse design.
Winner: Tie
Outback for space and long-haul comfort, Forester for daily versatility.
Reliability & Common Issues
Both vehicles share many components, especially in 2.5i trims, including the EJ25 engine. However, by now, condition and maintenance history outweigh model differences.
Common Issues (Both):
- Head gasket failures (especially on 2.5L engines).
- Rust in wheel wells and undercarriage in northern climates.
- Worn suspension bushings and wheel bearings.
- Automatic transmission longevity varies—manuals are generally more robust.
Outback-Specific:
- More complex rear suspension can be pricier to repair.
- 3.0R models (with H6 engines) are more reliable but harder to find.
Forester-Specific:
- Tighter engine bay makes some DIY work more difficult.
- More owners modified these for off-road use, which can affect wear.
Winner: Slight Edge to Outback
Fewer heavily abused examples, especially if you find a 3.0R.
Performance & Driving Experience
Outback
- Smooth, car-like ride due to Legacy roots.
- Available with 2.5L H4 or 3.0L H6 engines.
- AWD system feels more balanced on the road.
Forester
- Feels lighter and more nimble around town.
- 2.5XT turbo model offers sportier performance (if well-maintained).
- Shorter wheelbase = more responsive handling, but rougher ride.
Winner: Outback for Comfort, Forester for Fun
Fuel Economy
| Model | City (mpg) | Hwy (mpg) |
|---|---|---|
| Outback 2.5i | ~20 | ~26 |
| Outback 3.0R | ~18 | ~24 |
| Forester 2.5i | ~20 | ~25 |
| Forester XT | ~18 | ~24 |
Pretty close, though base Foresters tend to be a little more efficient due to lower weight.
Winner: Tie
Used Market Value (2025)
- Outback: $3,000–$6,000 (condition-dependent, H6 models higher)
- Forester: $2,500–$5,500 (XT models can go for more but may have wear)
Winner: Tie
Both offer strong value, though clean examples are harder to find each year.
Verdict: Which Aged Better?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Practicality | Outback |
| Reliability | Outback (slight) |
| Driving Experience | Forester (XT) |
| Fuel Economy | Tie |
| Cost of Ownership | Tie |
| Longevity Potential | Outback (3.0R) |
| Off-Road Fun | Forester |
Overall Winner: 2007 Subaru Outback
While both models aged well, the Outback edges out the Forester thanks to its greater comfort, cargo space, and available 3.0R engine. That said, if you can find a clean Forester XT, it’s a fun and capable choice for enthusiasts or off-roaders.
